Bibliographic citations
Luyo, V., Pacheco, G. (2024). Protección judicial en casos de violencia familiar: medidas cautelares sobre tenencia y régimen de visitas [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683477
Luyo, V., Pacheco, G. Protección judicial en casos de violencia familiar: medidas cautelares sobre tenencia y régimen de visitas [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683477
@misc{renati/1300547,
title = "Protección judicial en casos de violencia familiar: medidas cautelares sobre tenencia y régimen de visitas",
author = "Pacheco Ludeña, Guinette Alessandra",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2024"
}
This paper is about the Plenary Session that debates the admissibility of issuing precautionary measures in a family violence proceeding regarding custody and visitation schedule when there is a court ruling or sentence in the ordinary course proceeding. Within the debate on the indicated topic, two proposals have been presented, the first one stating that issuing precautionary measures in these cases would violate legal certainty, and the second, which obtained a majority of votes in the Plenary, defends the possibility of adopting these measures when there are imminent risks against the well-being of those affected. For the correct analysis of the Plenary Session, we have identified the conceptual bases necessary for the interpretation of the jurisprudential figure of precautionary measures in family violence proceedings regarding custody and visitation schedule. We must highlight that all the concepts developed: custody, visitation schedule, domestic violence, the Best Interest of the Child, precautionary measures and res judicata are relevant. The latter not only for a better understanding of what was debated but also to propose a correct application of what was decided by the majority in the Plenary Session. Pursuant to what was indicated at the plenary session and the conceptual bases applicable to this case, an analysis of the identified problems of legal and academic interests was carried out. In such, it was concluded the relevance of what was stated in the second proposal, since the protection of victims of violence is mentioned as the main basis. This clarifies that precautionary measures do not have the status of res judicata as they are provisional measures; therefore, they can be granted.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License