Bibliographic citations
Brain, S., (2023). Responsabilidad laboral en el contrato de franquicia: informe jurídico sobre Resolución N° 14 del Expediente N° 02500-2017-0-1601-JR-LA-07 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25690
Brain, S., Responsabilidad laboral en el contrato de franquicia: informe jurídico sobre Resolución N° 14 del Expediente N° 02500-2017-0-1601-JR-LA-07 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25690
@misc{renati/12259,
title = "Responsabilidad laboral en el contrato de franquicia: informe jurídico sobre Resolución N° 14 del Expediente N° 02500-2017-0-1601-JR-LA-07",
author = "Brain Barrientos, Sebastián",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
This legal report, based on the case object of Resolution No. 14 of File No. 02500- 2017-0-1601-JR-LA-07, seeks to solve the following legal problem: in which cases must the franchisor assume liability for labor obligations to the franchisee's employees? In order to address this problem, in the different sections of this academic work, a detailed exercise of legal argumentation is carried out, based on the review of regulations, jurisprudence and national and foreign doctrine. Thus, the academic work concludes by pointing out that the franchisor must assume liability for labor obligations to the franchisee's employees in two cases. In the first place, it must do so when a pathological or fraudulent use of the franchise agreement is verified; that is to say, when the franchise agreement is distorted. Secondly, from the doctrine, it is postulated that the franchisor should also assume responsibility for the labor obligations that the franchisee maintains with respect to its employees with the sole execution of the franchise contract, without it being necessary to identify a pathological scenario or fraud to the labor regulations. Therefore, in the specific case that was the subject of Resolution No. 14 of File No. 02500-2017-0-1601-JR-LA-07, it was concluded, on the one hand, that the franchise agreement entered into between the defendant companies was not distorted. On the other hand, it was concluded that in the Peruvian legal system there is no rule that allows assigning joint and several liability to the franchisor company for the sole execution of the franchise agreement
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.