Bibliographic citations
Shimabukuro, A., (2022). Giro programático del partido aprista peruano durante el periodo 2006-2021: Adaptación partidaria del PAP durante el segundo gobierno de Alan García (2006), ideología y fundamentos teóricos. [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23515
Shimabukuro, A., Giro programático del partido aprista peruano durante el periodo 2006-2021: Adaptación partidaria del PAP durante el segundo gobierno de Alan García (2006), ideología y fundamentos teóricos. []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23515
@misc{renati/11292,
title = "Giro programático del partido aprista peruano durante el periodo 2006-2021: Adaptación partidaria del PAP durante el segundo gobierno de Alan García (2006), ideología y fundamentos teóricos.",
author = "Shimabukuro Antezana, Adriano",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
The Peruvian Aprista Party (PAP) has undergone significant programmatic changes since its disruptive stage in the electoral environment, from its passage to illegality, until the last stretch of its institutional life at the end of the last century Although these changes in the political horizon are noteworthy, none has been as revealing as the one that took place from mid-2006 onwards. The second government of Alan García (2006-2011) was characterized by the inclusion of a large number of neoliberal "technicians" distributed from the highest positions (ministries) to positions of strategic importance in the Autonomous Constitutional Bodies. However, at the end of García's second administration, the APRA not only continued to position itself programmatically with the right-wing platform of 2006-2011 but accentuated it with the presidential nomination of former minister Mercedes Aráoz (occupying three portfolios and the PCM in García's administration), who later resigned from the race. In view of this, the research project seeks to investigate the motives and reasons that led the APRA (its leadership) to finally position itself on the right after the end of the second APRA government (2011) in a context of political supply that brought together various forces positioned on the right while the left found a certain degree of cohesion during the electoral periods of 2011 and 2016. To this end, this research work gathers information from secondary sources that include academic works, journalistic articles, books, autobiographies, and theses related to Latin American party systems, comparative studies of political parties in the region, the Peruvian electoral context, and the Peruvian Aprista Party (PAP).
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License