Bibliographic citations
Tunque, N., Almanza, G. (2022). Análisis comparativo de las propiedades físico-mecánicas entre el adobe compactado mejorado con mucilago de patakiska y el adobe compactado mejorado con mucilago de gigantón [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/4941
Tunque, N., Almanza, G. Análisis comparativo de las propiedades físico-mecánicas entre el adobe compactado mejorado con mucilago de patakiska y el adobe compactado mejorado con mucilago de gigantón []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/4941
@misc{renati/1128267,
title = "Análisis comparativo de las propiedades físico-mecánicas entre el adobe compactado mejorado con mucilago de patakiska y el adobe compactado mejorado con mucilago de gigantón",
author = "Almanza Olarte, Guido Yerson",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2022"
}
The present thesis entitled: "Comparative analysis of the physical-mechanical properties between the compacted adobe improved with Mucilago of Patakiska and the compacted adobe improved with Mucilago of Gigantón". Its main objective is to evaluate the PhysicalMechanical properties of the compacted adobe improved with Mucilago of Patakiska and the compacted adobe improved with Mucilago of Gigantón, replacing the optimal percentage of humidity 11.75% by the Mucilagos mentioned above, with the prevailing purpose of comparing the results. among them. The methodology used in the investigation had a quantitative approach, descriptive level with explanatory scope, experimental method, keeping in mind that the sampling method that proceeded in the investigation was for convenience, due to the fact that the sampling units were elaborated, where the population and the sample coincide in number, being a total of 72 units, of which 24 adobes were compacted without improvement of Mucilagos, 24 were compacted adobes improved with Mucilago of Patakiska and the residue of 24 were compacted adobes improved with Mucilago of Gigantón. Technical regulations and standards such as NTP E-080, NTP 399.613, NTP - 339.127, NTP 339.128, NTP 339.119 NTP 339.141: and the Spanish regulation (UNE41410, 2008)were used. In addition to formats for data collection, laboratory observation guides, later the tests of the physical-mechanical properties were carried out, such as: the property of absorption, suction, accelerated erosion of Swin Burne (SAET), and resistance to compression. These tests were carried out after 30 days of curing the adobe in the laboratory. Once the laboratory tests were completed, it was obtained that: the absorption property could not be evaluated due to the destruction of the specimens; the suction property in the compacted adobe with Mucilago of Patakiska sucks 11.25% less than the compacted adobe improved with Mucilago of Gigantón; In the compressive strength property, the compacted adobe with Mucilago of Patakiska resists compression 13.12% more than the compacted adobe improved with Mucilago of Gigantón; Finally, the resistance to erosion property, the adobes compacted with Mucilago de Patakiska have a resistance to erosion 14.56% more than the compacted adobe improved with Mucilago of Gigantón. Concluding that the Physical-Mechanical properties increase more when using Patakiska preferably than Giganton's Mucilage.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License