Bibliographic citations
Olivares, G., (2024). Precedentes vinculantes del Tribunal Constitucional y su repercusión sobre las funciones propias del Poder Legislativo y la autonomía procesal de los jueces en el Perú [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6292
Olivares, G., Precedentes vinculantes del Tribunal Constitucional y su repercusión sobre las funciones propias del Poder Legislativo y la autonomía procesal de los jueces en el Perú []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6292
@phdthesis{renati/1127896,
title = "Precedentes vinculantes del Tribunal Constitucional y su repercusión sobre las funciones propias del Poder Legislativo y la autonomía procesal de los jueces en el Perú",
author = "Olivares Torre, Gretel Roxana",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2024"
}
Just as European constitutional courts did decades ago, the Constitutional Court of Peru has been implementing decision-making techniques of an intermediate nature in recent years. These techniques usually include exhortations to the legislator to thrust the modification or creation of laws, which implies his intervention in the normative content of a legal provision. These actions follow the fundamental principle of interpreting the law under the Constitution. The concept of constitutional jurisdiction as a "nondestructive" task gradually acquires a "constructive and restorative" character, which encourages the creation of law by constitutional judges who use constitutional interpretation to exceed their powers. Thus, in the discussion of politically sensitive topics, facts and rights are less relevant aspects. In that order, the objective of this research is to analyze the main challenges posed by this new role that constitutional judges have assumed, highlighting both its risks and its benefits through the review of Peruvian binding constitutional jurisprudence.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License