Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Zinanyuca, J., Álvarez, H. (2023). La impunidad de infracciones administrativas y la transgresión de la celeridad procesal [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6101
Zinanyuca, J., Álvarez, H. La impunidad de infracciones administrativas y la transgresión de la celeridad procesal []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6101
@misc{renati/1127793,
title = "La impunidad de infracciones administrativas y la transgresión de la celeridad procesal",
author = "Álvarez Garcia, Harry Adolfo",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2023"
}
Title: La impunidad de infracciones administrativas y la transgresión de la celeridad procesal
Advisor(s): Álvarez Trujillo, María Antonieta
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Issue Date: 16-Oct-2023
Institution: Universidad Andina del Cusco
Abstract: La impunidad de infracciones administrativas y la transgresión de la celeridad procesal
en el contexto peruano son temas de preocupación en el sistema de justicia del país. La
impunidad se refiere a la falta de consecuencias legales o sanciones efectivas para
aquellos que cometen infracciones administrativas, lo que genera una sensación de falta
de justicia y promueve la repetición de conductas ilícitas.
En el ámbito administrativo, la impunidad puede manifestarse de varias maneras, como
la falta de investigaciones adecuadas, la demora en los procedimientos y la ausencia de
sanciones proporcionales. Esto puede deberse a diversas razones, como la falta de
recursos y personal especializado, la corrupción o la interferencia política en los procesos
administrativos.
En el caso específico de la celeridad procesal, se refiere a la rapidez y eficiencia con la
que se llevan a cabo los procesos legales. En el contexto peruano, se ha observado una
transgresión de este principio, lo que ha generado retrasos significativos en la resolución
de casos administrativos. Esto afecta negativamente la confianza en el sistema de justicia
y puede llevar a la impunidad, ya que los responsables de las infracciones pueden evitar
las consecuencias debido a la dilación en los procesos.
La falta de celeridad procesal puede estar relacionada con diversos factores, como la carga
excesiva de trabajo en los órganos administrativos, la falta de personal capacitado, la
complejidad normativa y los obstáculos burocráticos. Además, la interferencia política o
la corrupción pueden influir en los plazos y decisiones judiciales, lo que perjudica aún
más la celeridad y la imparcialidad de los procesos administrativos.
Impunity for administrative offenses and violation of procedural speed in the Peruvian context are issues of concern in the country's justice system. Impunity refers to the lack of legal consequences or effective sanctions for those who commit administrative offenses, which generates a feeling of lack of justice and promotes the repetition of illegal conduct. In the administrative sphere, impunity can manifest itself in various ways, such as the lack of adequate investigations, delays in proceedings, and the absence of proportional sanctions. This can be due to various reasons, such as a lack of resources and specialized personnel, corruption, or political interference in administrative processes. In the specific case of procedural speed, it refers to the speed and efficiency with which legal processes are carried out. In the Peruvian context, a violation of this principle has been observed, which has generated significant delays in the resolution of administrative cases. This negatively affects trust in the justice system and can lead to impunity, since those responsible for the offenses can avoid the consequences due to the delay in the processes. The lack of procedural speed may be related to various factors, such as excessive workload in administrative bodies, lack of trained personnel, regulatory complexity, and bureaucratic obstacles. In addition, political interference or corruption can influence judicial deadlines and decisions, further impairing the speed and impartiality of administrative processes.
Impunity for administrative offenses and violation of procedural speed in the Peruvian context are issues of concern in the country's justice system. Impunity refers to the lack of legal consequences or effective sanctions for those who commit administrative offenses, which generates a feeling of lack of justice and promotes the repetition of illegal conduct. In the administrative sphere, impunity can manifest itself in various ways, such as the lack of adequate investigations, delays in proceedings, and the absence of proportional sanctions. This can be due to various reasons, such as a lack of resources and specialized personnel, corruption, or political interference in administrative processes. In the specific case of procedural speed, it refers to the speed and efficiency with which legal processes are carried out. In the Peruvian context, a violation of this principle has been observed, which has generated significant delays in the resolution of administrative cases. This negatively affects trust in the justice system and can lead to impunity, since those responsible for the offenses can avoid the consequences due to the delay in the processes. The lack of procedural speed may be related to various factors, such as excessive workload in administrative bodies, lack of trained personnel, regulatory complexity, and bureaucratic obstacles. In addition, political interference or corruption can influence judicial deadlines and decisions, further impairing the speed and impartiality of administrative processes.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6101
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Andina del Cusco. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencia Política
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Yoshisato Alvarez, Mario; Calvo Rodriguez, Yuri; Pozo Roldán, Clorinda; Macedo Córdova, Vicente
Register date: 4-Mar-2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License