Bibliographic citations
Jiménez, G., (2019). Proximidad entre la pared basal del antro de Highmore y el ápice de las piezas dentarias según la clasificación de Evren ok en Tomografías Cone Beam de la Clínica Estomatológica Luis Vallejos Santoni de la Universidad Andina del Cusco 2019-I [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/3511
Jiménez, G., Proximidad entre la pared basal del antro de Highmore y el ápice de las piezas dentarias según la clasificación de Evren ok en Tomografías Cone Beam de la Clínica Estomatológica Luis Vallejos Santoni de la Universidad Andina del Cusco 2019-I [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/3511
@misc{renati/1126700,
title = "Proximidad entre la pared basal del antro de Highmore y el ápice de las piezas dentarias según la clasificación de Evren ok en Tomografías Cone Beam de la Clínica Estomatológica Luis Vallejos Santoni de la Universidad Andina del Cusco 2019-I",
author = "Jiménez Villalba, Grety",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2019"
}
The purpose of this study is to determine the proximity between the basal wall of the highmore antrum and the apex of the teeth according to the Evren Ok classification in Cone Beam tomographies of the Luis Vallejos Santoni Stomatological Clinic of the Andean University of Cusco Being a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive, transversal and retrospective research. Whose population was made up of 280 Cone Beam Tomographs that were taken in the area of radiological diagnosis of the stomatological clinic Luis Vallejos Santoni during the semester 2019 –I, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria a sample of 159 tomographs was obtained, 89 of the sex female, 70 male with ages from 25 years and up. The present study showed that the highest frequencies of the Evren OK classification in higher premolars in both age groups was Type III. What determines part 1.4 presented in its highest percentage a type 3 with 91.7% and in a smaller percentage a Type I (2.8%), piece 1.5 presented in its highest percentage a Type III (54.1%) and in a smaller percentage a Type I (13.5%), piece 2.4 presented a Type 3 (89%) in its highest percentage and a Type I (3.7%) in a smaller percentage, piece 2.5 presented a Type III (66.7%) and to a lesser extent a Type I (13.5%). and in higher molars piece 16 presented in its highest percentage a Type II with 39.2% and in a smaller percentage a Type I (23.4%), piece 1.7 presented in its highest percentage a Type I (38%) and in a smaller percentage a Type II (28.9%), piece 2.6 presented a Type III (40.2%) in its highest percentage and a Type I (28.7%) in a smaller percentage, piece 2.7 presented a Type I (39.8%) in its highest percentage and to a lesser extent a Type II (29.3%). In conclusion, premolars do not represent a greater risk in relation to the basal wall of the highmore antrum, unlike part 1.6 where Type II relationship predominates and in Type 1.7 the type I relationship predominates, which It means that there is more risk of bucosinusal communication in these teeth.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.