Bibliographic citations
Vargas, I., (2024). Informe Jurídico sobre el Laudo Arbitral N°122-2010 (Consorcio JOHESA UPACA contra el Proyecto especial de infraestructura de transporte nacional-PROVIAS NACIONAL) [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28343
Vargas, I., Informe Jurídico sobre el Laudo Arbitral N°122-2010 (Consorcio JOHESA UPACA contra el Proyecto especial de infraestructura de transporte nacional-PROVIAS NACIONAL) []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28343
@misc{renati/11138,
title = "Informe Jurídico sobre el Laudo Arbitral N°122-2010 (Consorcio JOHESA UPACA contra el Proyecto especial de infraestructura de transporte nacional-PROVIAS NACIONAL)",
author = "Vargas López, Isavo Irina",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This report analyzes the arbitration case N°122-2010 followed by the consortium Johesa Upaca against the Special Project of National Transportation Infrastructure - PROVIAS NACIONAL, through which the consortium's claim is analyzed in order to determine the irregularity and untimeliness of the resolution approving the liquidation of the construction contract carried out by the Entity and, in turn, on the consent of the contract liquidation presented by the contractor. To this end, it is necessary to evaluate the work settlements submitted by the parties in order to determine which of them followed the regular procedure established by law. It should be noted that this examination will be carried out under the analysis of the State contracting and procurement rules and regulations applicable to the case. Likewise, it is necessary to analyze whether a comptroller's finding can generate variations in an approved and consented extension of time and, in turn, to determine the competence of the Arbitral Tribunal to deal with the unjust enrichment in relation to the compensation requested by the claimant.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License