Bibliographic citations
Rodríguez, D., (2024). Informe sobre Expediente de relevancia jurídica 105-2018/CCD, E-2816, denuncia de la Asociación de Consumidores Indignados contra Uber B.V. y Uber Perú S.A.C. por actos de competencia desleal en la modalidad de violación de normas [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27864
Rodríguez, D., Informe sobre Expediente de relevancia jurídica 105-2018/CCD, E-2816, denuncia de la Asociación de Consumidores Indignados contra Uber B.V. y Uber Perú S.A.C. por actos de competencia desleal en la modalidad de violación de normas []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27864
@misc{renati/11031,
title = "Informe sobre Expediente de relevancia jurídica 105-2018/CCD, E-2816, denuncia de la Asociación de Consumidores Indignados contra Uber B.V. y Uber Perú S.A.C. por actos de competencia desleal en la modalidad de violación de normas",
author = "Rodríguez Tamo, Daniel Andrés",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This legal paper analyses the complaint failed by the Association of Outraged Consumers of Peru against Uber B.V. and Uber Peru S.A. before the National Institute for the Defence of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property, for the alleged commission of acts of unfair competition in the form of a violation of regulations. The file contains a key legal problem which consists in analysing the legal nature of the economic activity carried out of the economic agent operating the “Uber” app and, as a consequence, whether its execution requires the enabling authorization issued by the Metropolitan Municipality of Lima for the provision of taxi services. Furthermore, two other legal problems are noted, linked to the passive standing of Uber Peru S.A. within the procedure and the notification abroad to Uber B.V. For the analysis of these legal problems, this legal paper delves into the analysis of a range of legal concepts, such as the passive standing, the right to be notified as part of the right of defence, the significant competitive advantage, among others. Moreover, an in-depth analysis is made regarding the definition, characteristics, classifications and regulation in Peru of collaborative economy phenomena, and its participants, users, providers and collaborative platforms. Among conclusions, the first research hypothesis are confirmed, referred to the inequivalence between the activity carried out by a collaborative platform and the underlying service, the absence of passive standing of Uber Peru S.A. and the failure to comply with the legally prescribed procedures for the notification of Uber B.V. abroad.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License