Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Suárez, N., (2022). Los criterios de imputación objetiva en el delito de peculado: Análisis del R.N. N° 2124-2018-LIMA [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23084
Suárez, N., Los criterios de imputación objetiva en el delito de peculado: Análisis del R.N. N° 2124-2018-LIMA []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23084
@misc{renati/10775,
title = "Los criterios de imputación objetiva en el delito de peculado: Análisis del R.N. N° 2124-2018-LIMA",
author = "Suárez Fachin, Norma Dalia",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
Title: Los criterios de imputación objetiva en el delito de peculado: Análisis del R.N. N° 2124-2018-LIMA
Authors(s): Suárez Fachin, Norma Dalia
Advisor(s): Torres Pachas, David Ricardo
Keywords: Peculado; Delitos de los funcionarios--Perú; Responsabilidad penal; Derecho penal--Jurisprudencia--Perú
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.02
Issue Date: 15-Aug-2022
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: El objeto principal del presente trabajo es analizar los criterios de exclusión de la teoría
de imputación objetiva a partir del razonamiento jurídico efectuado por la Corte Suprema
de Justicia en el Recurso de Nulidad N° 2124-2018-LIMA, abarcando el proceso penal
seguido en contra de personal militar del Ejército del Perú por delito de peculado por
apropiación, donde se habrían coordinado y ejecutado una serie de actuaciones con el
objeto de apropiarse reiterada y sistemáticamente del combustible asignado a dos
dependencias militares durante el año 2006. La Corte Suprema condenó a los altos
mandos por incumplir sus deberes de control y supervisión, pese a contar con una
posición de garante; mientras que, al personal subalterno los absolvió por mantener
competencias limitadas y adoptar conductas neutrales en el curso delictivo. La
metodología utilizada para el desarrollo del presente trabajo consistió en la búsqueda,
revisión y análisis de legislación y jurisprudencia nacionales, así como de doctrina
nacional y extranjera respecto de las posturas doctrinarias sobre los criterios de
imputación objetiva más representativos.
Luego del análisis del Recurso de Nulidad, se concluye que fue adecuada la decisión de
no aplicar los criterios de exclusión de principio de confianza y prohibición de regreso a
los oficiales de mayor jerarquía; por el contrario, en la decisión de excluir de
responsabilidad penal a los subalternos, no se habría considerado los presupuestos de
aplicación de las categorías prohibición de regreso y conductas neutrales, conforme a los
planteamientos de imputación objetiva que se han adoptado para los fines del presente
informe, que niegan la prohibición de regreso para quienes ostentan una posición de
garante de protección.
The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusion criteria of the theory of objective imputation, based on the legal reasoning carried out by the Supreme Court of Justice in the Appeal for Annulment No. 2124-2018-LIMA, covering the criminal proceeding followed against military personnel of the Peruvian Army for the crime of embezzlement by appropriation, where they would have coordinated and executed a series of actions with the aim of repeatedly and systematically appropriating the fuel assigned to two military units during the year 2006. The Supreme Court convicted the high command for failing to comply with their duties of control and supervision, despite having a position of guarantor, while the subordinate personnel were acquitted for maintaining limited competences and adopting neutral behaviors in the criminal actions. The methodology used for the development of this work consisted of the search, review and analysis of national legislation and jurisprudence, as well as national and foreign doctrine regarding the doctrinal positions on the most representative objective imputation criteria. After the analysis of the Appeal for Annulment, it is concluded that the decision to not apply the exclusion criteria of the principle of trust and the prohibition of the return of higher-ranking officers was adequate. On the contrary, in the decision to exclude subordinates from criminal liability, the pre-requisites for the application of the categories of prohibition of return and neutral conduct would not have been considered, in accordance with the approaches of objective imputation that have been adopted for the purposes of this paper, which deny the prohibition of return for those who hold a position of guarantor of protection.
The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusion criteria of the theory of objective imputation, based on the legal reasoning carried out by the Supreme Court of Justice in the Appeal for Annulment No. 2124-2018-LIMA, covering the criminal proceeding followed against military personnel of the Peruvian Army for the crime of embezzlement by appropriation, where they would have coordinated and executed a series of actions with the aim of repeatedly and systematically appropriating the fuel assigned to two military units during the year 2006. The Supreme Court convicted the high command for failing to comply with their duties of control and supervision, despite having a position of guarantor, while the subordinate personnel were acquitted for maintaining limited competences and adopting neutral behaviors in the criminal actions. The methodology used for the development of this work consisted of the search, review and analysis of national legislation and jurisprudence, as well as national and foreign doctrine regarding the doctrinal positions on the most representative objective imputation criteria. After the analysis of the Appeal for Annulment, it is concluded that the decision to not apply the exclusion criteria of the principle of trust and the prohibition of the return of higher-ranking officers was adequate. On the contrary, in the decision to exclude subordinates from criminal liability, the pre-requisites for the application of the categories of prohibition of return and neutral conduct would not have been considered, in accordance with the approaches of objective imputation that have been adopted for the purposes of this paper, which deny the prohibition of return for those who hold a position of guarantor of protection.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23084
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Facultad de Derecho.
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Torres Pachas, David Ricardo; Meini Méndez, Iván Fabio; Quispe Meza, Daniel Simón
Register date: 15-Aug-2022
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License