Bibliographic citations
Paraguay, P., Vasquez, E. (2024). Alcances del nombramiento y aceptación indebida del cargo: ¿nombramiento y/o designación? [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683733
Paraguay, P., Vasquez, E. Alcances del nombramiento y aceptación indebida del cargo: ¿nombramiento y/o designación? [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683733
@misc{renati/1051558,
title = "Alcances del nombramiento y aceptación indebida del cargo: ¿nombramiento y/o designación?",
author = "Vasquez Alvarez, Estrellita Del Rocio Angie",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2024"
}
This professional sufficiency work on the scope of the appointment and/or designation of the crime of appointment and improper acceptance of the position, from the jurisprudential development given by the Cassation N°418-2019 Santa, where the sentenced Javier Chiong Ampudia appoints the accused Zoila Córdoba Zuloeta, who accepts the position without fulfilling the legal requirements, as head for the Legal Counsel Office of the Chinecas Special Project, conviction sentence issued on December 28, 2018, which was confirmed. The supreme judges of the Permanent Criminal Chamber declared the cassation appeal UNFOUNDED, which ratified the conviction for both public officials based on the argument that “designation or appointment” are typical conducts of the referred crime, as opposed to the position of the defense that he had only “appointed” in the position. The present topic corresponds to the area of Criminal Law, specifically to the special part referring to the criminal types of the Crime of Appointment and undue acceptance of the position, a topic that will allow us to elucidate the scope and/or positions regarding the typical conduct of the crime. Said jurisprudence puts into debate Article 381° of the Criminal Code if it includes both the appointment and the designation for its typical configuration. Finally, with such analysis, we agree with the decision of the Supreme Court, since it evaluates the jurisprudential part and invokes the suitability of each of the actions of the perpetrators, arguing under the legal standards required the objective requirement of each profile for the position.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License