Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Zulueta, I., (2023). El proceso de regularización de armas de fuego de la Sucamec 2016 - 2018 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26240
Zulueta, I., El proceso de regularización de armas de fuego de la Sucamec 2016 - 2018 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26240
@mastersthesis{renati/10399,
title = "El proceso de regularización de armas de fuego de la Sucamec 2016 - 2018",
author = "Zulueta Villalta, Irma Pamela",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
Title: El proceso de regularización de armas de fuego de la Sucamec 2016 - 2018
Authors(s): Zulueta Villalta, Irma Pamela
Advisor(s): Torres Hidalgo, Carlos
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.06.02
Issue Date: 25-Oct-2023
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: El proceso de regularización de licencias vencidas de armas de fuego se llevó a cabo en el Perú por la Superintendencia Nacional de Control de Servicios de Seguridad, Armas, Municiones y Explosivos de Uso Civil (Sucamec) durante 2016 y 2018, como parte del control de armas en el país. En julio de 2016 entró en vigencia la Ley n.° 30299, Ley de Armas, la cual estableció nuevas reglas de juego para los portadores legales de armas, quedando vencidas, a partir de esa fecha, las licencias existentes para un promedio de 400 000 ciudadanos. Cabe precisar que para entonces ya existían miles de licencias vencidas que no habían sido renovadas desde hacía muchos años, significando para el Estado peruano el desconocimiento del lugar exacto donde se encontraban esas armas, las cuales incluso podrían haber sido utilizadas para actos delictivos. Por ello, con la nueva ley, todos los usuarios legales debían realizar el proceso de regularización y demostrar que las armas aún estaban en su poder. Sin embargo, al finalizar el proceso no fueron regularizadas el total de licencias, quedaron sin renovar y con orden de decomiso un total de 108 mil armas de fuego. En ese sentido, se ha realizado el presente estudio para conocer cómo se llevó a cabo este proceso y cuáles fueron los principales factores que impidieron la regularización de todas las licencias vencidas, siendo principalmente motivos relacionados con la falta de estrategia de intervención que deben seguir todos los procesos realizados por las instituciones del Estado, en el marco de la política de modernización de la gestión pública. Asimismo, desde un enfoque de la Gerencia Social, se proponen acciones que permitan contribuir con el control de armas en el Perú. La investigación es de tipo mixta, recurriendo para la obtención de datos a herramientas como revisión bibliográfica, entrevistas y una encuesta a los usuarios de armas que participaron del proceso
Regularization process of expired firearms licenses was carried out in Peru by the National Superintendency of Control of Security Services, Arms, Ammunition and Explosives for Civil Use (Sucamec) during 2016 and 2018, as part of the control of arms in the country. In July 2016, Law n.° 30299, the Arms Law, came into force, which established new rules of the game for legal arms carriers, leaving existing licenses for an average of 400,000 citizens expired as of that date. By then there were already thousands of expired licenses that had not been renewed for many years, meaning for the Peruvian State the ignorance of the exact place where these weapons were, which could even have been used for criminal acts. With the new law, all legal users had to regularize their licenses and demonstrate that the weapons were still in their possession. However, at the end of the process, the total licenses were not regularized, a total of 108 thousand firearms remained unrenewed and with a confiscation order. In this sense, the present study has been carried out to find out how this process was carried out and what were the main factors that prevented the regularization of all expired licenses, being mainly reasons related to the lack of intervention strategy that all must follow. the processes carried out by State institutions, within the framework of the policy of modernization of public management. Likewise, from a social management approach, actions are proposed to contribute to arms control in Peru. The research is of a mixed type, resorting to tools such as bibliographic review, interviews and a survey of gun users who participated in the process to obtain data
Regularization process of expired firearms licenses was carried out in Peru by the National Superintendency of Control of Security Services, Arms, Ammunition and Explosives for Civil Use (Sucamec) during 2016 and 2018, as part of the control of arms in the country. In July 2016, Law n.° 30299, the Arms Law, came into force, which established new rules of the game for legal arms carriers, leaving existing licenses for an average of 400,000 citizens expired as of that date. By then there were already thousands of expired licenses that had not been renewed for many years, meaning for the Peruvian State the ignorance of the exact place where these weapons were, which could even have been used for criminal acts. With the new law, all legal users had to regularize their licenses and demonstrate that the weapons were still in their possession. However, at the end of the process, the total licenses were not regularized, a total of 108 thousand firearms remained unrenewed and with a confiscation order. In this sense, the present study has been carried out to find out how this process was carried out and what were the main factors that prevented the regularization of all expired licenses, being mainly reasons related to the lack of intervention strategy that all must follow. the processes carried out by State institutions, within the framework of the policy of modernization of public management. Likewise, from a social management approach, actions are proposed to contribute to arms control in Peru. The research is of a mixed type, resorting to tools such as bibliographic review, interviews and a survey of gun users who participated in the process to obtain data
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26240
Discipline: Gerencia Social con mención en Gerencia de Programas y Proyectos de Desarrollo
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Escuela de Posgrado
Grade or title: Maestro en Gerencia Social con mención en Gerencia de Programas y Proyectos de Desarrollo
Juror: Zuñiga Loayza, Cesar Hernan; Fernandez Castillo, Patricia Rosa
Register date: 25-Oct-2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License