Bibliographic citations
Nuñez, K., (2024). Clima social familiar y conductas disociales en adolescentes de una institución educativa pública del distrito de San Luis, Lima, 2022 [Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/12378
Nuñez, K., Clima social familiar y conductas disociales en adolescentes de una institución educativa pública del distrito de San Luis, Lima, 2022 []. PE: Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/12378
@misc{renati/1039393,
title = "Clima social familiar y conductas disociales en adolescentes de una institución educativa pública del distrito de San Luis, Lima, 2022",
author = "Nuñez Zambrano, Karla Rosa",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener",
year = "2024"
}
The primary objective of this research was to determine the relationship between family social climate and antisocial behaviors in adolescents from a public educational institution in the district of San Luis, Lima, in 2022. Information was collected using the survey technique (Arispe et al., 2020). Two psychometric scales were used: (1) the Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire, developed in the Peruvian context (Alcántara, 2016), and (2) the Family Social Climate Scale (Moos, Moos, & Trickett, 1974), adapted to the Peruvian context by Barrionuevo (2017). The sample consisted of 171 adolescents of both sexes, aged between 11-18 years, who were enrolled in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades of secondary school. The results revealed that the majority of participants reported experiencing a medium level of family social climate, representing 64.9% (111) of the sample. Additionally, 40.4% (69) of adolescents presented a moderate level of antisocial behaviors. The study analysis determined that there is no significant correlation between the variables. However, further analysis of the relationships between the dimensions of family social climate and antisocial behavior found that the factors Relationships (p = -0.290) and Stability (p = -0.467) are higher and statistically significant (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, this significance was not observed for the Development factor.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License