Bibliographic citations
Marlo, K., Peña, J. (2021). Análisis de capacidad portante mediante el ensayo de corte directo y el método empírico de la barra en la localidad de Naranjos – distrito Pardo Miguel – provincia Rioja - Perú 2021 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional, Universidad Científica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/1387
Marlo, K., Peña, J. Análisis de capacidad portante mediante el ensayo de corte directo y el método empírico de la barra en la localidad de Naranjos – distrito Pardo Miguel – provincia Rioja - Perú 2021 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional]. PE: Universidad Científica del Perú; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/1387
@misc{renati/1036338,
title = "Análisis de capacidad portante mediante el ensayo de corte directo y el método empírico de la barra en la localidad de Naranjos – distrito Pardo Miguel – provincia Rioja - Perú 2021",
author = "Peña Arevalo, Jhojan Roy",
publisher = "Universidad Científica del Perú",
year = "2021"
}
The main objective of this research project was to determine the relationship between the results of the bearing capacity of the foundation soil, obtained through the "direct shear test" and the "bar method". Three (03) test pits of 1.50 m depth were made from the natural ground, in a lot located at Av. Aguajal Cd. 12 M 53 lot 11-Naranjos, of soil type CL according to the SUCS classification, performing 5 tests of the "bar method" and 1 direct shear test for each test pit. The results for the "bar method" were obtained by applying the formulas 𝒒𝒂𝒅𝒎. = ( 𝟔 𝟏𝟎) ∗ ( 𝑾∗𝑯 𝝅∗𝑫𝟐∗𝒉 ) y 𝒒𝒂𝒅𝒎. = ( 𝟏 𝒉 ) ∗ 𝟏𝟎. In light of the results, it is concluded that the application of formula 1 for the empirical bar method yields more consistent values that are closer to the values of qadm determined by the direct shear test, there being a default difference between the result of the bar method and the direct shear test, for a footing with a width of 1 m is 1. 21 % for test pit N° 02 and 8.37 % for test pit N° 01 and 22.96 % for test pit N° 03; the results being closer according to the lower dry density. The empirical bar method can be used for a 60 cm wide strip foundation, which is where it is more similar to the direct cut method, with a default difference between the results of the bar method and the direct cut test of 1.12 % for test pit N° 02 and 7.36 % for test pit N° 01 and 21.2 % for test pit N° 03. It can be seen that the results vary considerably in test pit N° 03 due to the fact that it had some boulder.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License