Bibliographic citations
Gutierrez, G., (2024). Expediente Privado N° 02919-2013-0-0401-JR-CI-09 y Expediente Público N° 15347-2017-0-1801-JR-CA-25 [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683158
Gutierrez, G., Expediente Privado N° 02919-2013-0-0401-JR-CI-09 y Expediente Público N° 15347-2017-0-1801-JR-CA-25 [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683158
@misc{renati/1033042,
title = "Expediente Privado N° 02919-2013-0-0401-JR-CI-09 y Expediente Público N° 15347-2017-0-1801-JR-CA-25",
author = "Gutierrez Muñoz, Gian Marco",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2024"
}
Private Case 2919-2013 took place in Arequipa and deals with a case of eviction due to precarious occupation between VMP, the registered owner of Sublot A, who demands the restitution of her property; and LMMS and FMMS, the heirs of the original co-owner of the Real Estate Unit composed by Sublots A and B, who claim to be legitimate possessors of the property and intend to continue possessing it. The parties to the proceeding are related, and therefore, in addition to the rules and criteria for eviction, the rules of inheritance law will be applied. Likewise, contradictory judicial pronouncements will be issued in each of the ordinary instances, and the controversy will be resolved in the extraordinary instance of cassation. Public File 15347-2017 occurred in Lima and develops a case of nullity of administrative act between the natural gas concessionaire GNC, who demands the nullity of Resolution No. 4670-2017 for not applying Article 75 of the Natural Gas Regulation that exempts the company from the pre-notice before meter manipulations; and OSINERGMIN that asks to keep its resolution for strict observance of Article 72 of the Regulation that requires the company to comply with the pre-notice, alleging that such requirement must always be complied with. The parties are administrative bodies that control the gas activity, but they have different interpretations of the sector's regulations, which is the trigger for the litigation. The courts will not be unaware of the exegetical controversy, assuming dissimilar criteria.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License