Bibliographic citations
Sandoval, G., (2020). Kant en el dilema liberal : igualdad y libertades individuales en las teorías de la justicia de John Rawls y Robert Nozick [Universidad Antonio Ruiz de Montoya]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12833/2133
Sandoval, G., Kant en el dilema liberal : igualdad y libertades individuales en las teorías de la justicia de John Rawls y Robert Nozick []. PE: Universidad Antonio Ruiz de Montoya; 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12833/2133
@mastersthesis{renati/1008087,
title = "Kant en el dilema liberal : igualdad y libertades individuales en las teorías de la justicia de John Rawls y Robert Nozick",
author = "Sandoval Mendoza, Gian Franco",
publisher = "Universidad Antonio Ruiz de Montoya",
year = "2020"
}
The difficulty in constructing and proposing a coherent and articulated political theory that incorporates within its fundamental principles both the defense of individual freedoms and social equality represents a challenge for conceptionsof justice within liberalism. Can liberal justice reconcile the ideals of individual freedom and equality? What is the role that a State committed to these idealsmust fulfill in the face of problems such as poverty, malnutrition, lack of access to health or education? Should the State use taxes we pay in favor of social proposals that help individuals overcome these conditions or does that mean an unacceptable violation of individual freedoms? The answers offered by the philosophical theories of John Rawls and Robert Nozick to this problem do not seem to converge easily even though both contemplate Kantian moral theory in important aspects of their proposals.Thisissue merits a double task: that of carefully reviewing the valuation of Kant's work by these two perspectives and that of deepening Kantian theory regarding a possible articulation between equality and individual freedom.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License