Citas bibligráficas
Del, J., (2024). Alcances y límites de la prohibición de reforma peyorativa en la impugnación de actos administrativos [Trabajo académico, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27264
Del, J., Alcances y límites de la prohibición de reforma peyorativa en la impugnación de actos administrativos [Trabajo académico]. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27264
@misc{renati/528667,
title = "Alcances y límites de la prohibición de reforma peyorativa en la impugnación de actos administrativos",
author = "Del Risco Ramírez, José Antonio",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This research will address a problem related to one of the most important legal figures related to the impugnation of administrative acts. We are referring to the interdiction or prohibition of pejorative reform. Throughout this paper, we will argue that the application of this guarantee, created precisely to favour the appellant, should not be limited only to administrative sanctioning procedures. Although such an approach contradicts the wording of article 258.3 of the TUO of Law No. 27444, as well as the Peruvian administrative practice that has been carried out over the years, we consider that there are doctrinal, constitutional and jurisprudential grounds to support a broad and extensive interpretation of the “non reformatio in peius”. In fact, this legal figure should also be invoked when appealing administrative acts in any type of procedure, with the exception of trilateral procedures, to which special principles and guarantees apply.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons