Bibliographic citations
Gambini, A., Quispe, A. (2023). Análisis Jurídico de la Sentencia de Casación N° 466-2022: Implicaciones del Código 13 en la DAM de Exportación y su efecto en el Régimen del Drawback [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671954
Gambini, A., Quispe, A. Análisis Jurídico de la Sentencia de Casación N° 466-2022: Implicaciones del Código 13 en la DAM de Exportación y su efecto en el Régimen del Drawback [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671954
@misc{renati/413481,
title = "Análisis Jurídico de la Sentencia de Casación N° 466-2022: Implicaciones del Código 13 en la DAM de Exportación y su efecto en el Régimen del Drawback",
author = "Quispe Torres, Amy Grimaneza",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
In the present case of Customs Law, the legal debate to be discussed is whether it is appropriate (or not) to invoke the benefit of the “Drawback” customs regime only by expressing the will of the exporter, if there is a Resolution Number 00183 which provides in section VII what the exporter must consider, when filling out the Single Customs Declaration (DUA), it shall include code 13 in order to invoke the customs benefit of Drawback. This controversy reached the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic through an appeal filed by the National Superintendency of Customs and Tax Administration (SUNAT), after the Tax Court made the decision that the exporter had expressed its will, therefore, it shall comply with the Drawback regime. In this order of ideas, this case has a special consideration as it is a binding precedent that provides the exporter with greater legal certainty since, before this precedent, not placing code 13 meant giving up the benefit of Drawback.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License