Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Almanza, L., Meneses, V. (2021). Los precedentes vinculantes y sus efectos en la seguridad jurídica en Perú, 2020 [Universidad Peruana de las Américas]. http://repositorio.ulasamericas.edu.pe/handle/upa/1522
Almanza, L., Meneses, V. Los precedentes vinculantes y sus efectos en la seguridad jurídica en Perú, 2020 []. PE: Universidad Peruana de las Américas; 2021. http://repositorio.ulasamericas.edu.pe/handle/upa/1522
@misc{sunedu/3337309,
title = "Los precedentes vinculantes y sus efectos en la seguridad jurídica en Perú, 2020",
author = "Meneses Perez, Victor Hugo",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de las Américas",
year = "2021"
}
Title: Los precedentes vinculantes y sus efectos en la seguridad jurídica en Perú, 2020
Authors(s): Almanza Acosta, Luis Benjamin; Meneses Perez, Victor Hugo
Advisor(s): Charry Aysanoa, Juan Marciano
Keywords: Precedente vinculante; Seguridad jurídica; Sentencia
OCDE field: http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
Issue Date: Oct-2021
Institution: Universidad Peruana de las Américas
Abstract: El presente trabajo de investigación tuvo como objetivo Determinar la influencia del
precedente vinculante sobre la seguridad jurídica en Perú, Lima 2020.
La metodología aplicada fue de paradigma interpretativo, enfoque cualitativo, propósito
básico, método a aplicar inductivo, diseño sociológico-jurídica. La población la conformo las
sentencias interlocutorias emitidas por el Tribunal Constitucional en el 2019 en materia de
agravio constitucional, publicadas en el sitio web del Tribunal y la muestra 33 de estas
sentencias escogidas al azar. La recolección de datos se realizó a través de la técnica del análisis
documental y la observación, almacenando y sistematizando los datos obtenidos para su
respectivo análisis, a través de una categorización, la cual facilita la triangulación de la
información y el desglosamiento de los resultados.
Los resultados arrojaron que una vez analizadas las resoluciones judiciales queconforman
la muestra se evidencia que los precedentes vinculantes (en este caso el precedente vinculante
Vázquez Romero) ciertamente impactan sobre la seguridad jurídica en Perú, puesto que de las
33 sentencias 31 fueron declaradas improcedentes fundadas en el precedente vinculante sin
realizar revisión del fondo de la causa, lo que trae como consecuencia el causar por parte del
TC perjuicios al no garantizar la objetiva aplicación de la ley, dejando en estado de indefensión
a los recurrentes. Se concluyó que efectivamente una variable impacta sobre la otra.
The objective of this research work was to determine the influence of binding precedent on legal security in Peru, Lima 2020. The methodology applied was of interpretative paradigm, qualitative approach, basic purpose, inductive method to be applied, sociological-legal design. The population was formed by the interlocutory sentences issued by the Constitutional Court in 2019 on constitutionaltort, published on the Court's website and the sample was 33 of these sentences chosen at random. Data collection was carried out through the technique of documentary analysis and observation, storing and systematizing the data obtained for their respective analysis, through a categorization, which facilitates the triangulation of information and the breakdown of the results. The results showed that once the judicial resolutions that make up the sample were analyzed, it is evident that binding precedents (in this case the binding precedent Vázquez Romero) certainly have an impact on legal security in Peru, since of the 33 sentences, 31 were declared inadmissible based on the binding precedent without reviewing the merits of the case, which results in the TC causing damages by not guaranteeing the objective application of the law, leaving the appellants in a state of defenselessness. It was concluded that effectively one variable impacts on the other.
The objective of this research work was to determine the influence of binding precedent on legal security in Peru, Lima 2020. The methodology applied was of interpretative paradigm, qualitative approach, basic purpose, inductive method to be applied, sociological-legal design. The population was formed by the interlocutory sentences issued by the Constitutional Court in 2019 on constitutionaltort, published on the Court's website and the sample was 33 of these sentences chosen at random. Data collection was carried out through the technique of documentary analysis and observation, storing and systematizing the data obtained for their respective analysis, through a categorization, which facilitates the triangulation of information and the breakdown of the results. The results showed that once the judicial resolutions that make up the sample were analyzed, it is evident that binding precedents (in this case the binding precedent Vázquez Romero) certainly have an impact on legal security in Peru, since of the 33 sentences, 31 were declared inadmissible based on the binding precedent without reviewing the merits of the case, which results in the TC causing damages by not guaranteeing the objective application of the law, leaving the appellants in a state of defenselessness. It was concluded that effectively one variable impacts on the other.
Link to repository: http://repositorio.ulasamericas.edu.pe/handle/upa/1522
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Peruana de las Américas. Facultad de Derecho
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Borcic Santos, Andres Jose; Moscoso Valenzuela, Gladys Margarita; Capcha Carrillo, Tito
Register date: 29-Oct-2021; 29-Oct-2021
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ALMANZA_MENESES.pdf Restricted Access | 1.26 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License